Can ChatGPT replace Mii at writing about sustainable building with salvage materials without good questions?


You can manipulate computer AI by the way you ask it to design a response, to answer as you want it to, like a magic trick, you can think beyond the computer’s logic to design answers you want.

TINY TEXAS HOUSES NEWSLETTER

Yikes, I have been replaced! Or have I? Who will ask the right questions and know if the answers are simply hallucinations, inadequate, or just plain wrong?

Yikes, ChatGPT took over my ability, and now I can not speak freely. What if I just use it instead of writing what is in my head? I will just chirp instead!

Suppose you simply let AI write your papers for school, or for that matter, answer your questions on life or science. In that case, you must be aware of the potential to get answers that may appear to include all the information or perspectives available but only solutions within the parameters of the way the question is phrased.

Here is my example with some pictures of salvage and salvage building results to enjoy as you consider that this is true but far from as complete as it will be when I design a better question to get more of the resulting answer, logic train, and other components that a properly wrought question can create.

If this is so, are there ways to manipulate the results of a question by how you interpret the intentional goals of the person designing the question? Are you aware of how this magic can be done to create questions that will lead to the answers you want logically and accurately, and yet still have much more that could be included and even alter the results if you know how to ask the question right? This means exclusive and inclusive details that become parameters in a question that can alter the results dramatically without being noticed until you see the differences. These are the nuances of Mass Media and narratives by marketers, con men, or governments that often fool people into thinking they have all the facts they need to make a rational and wise decision. The last few years have been full of these sorts of trick questions and answers that people need to learn to spot in order to understand what makes a good question and answer or be fooled more as AI takes on the mantle of Truth, even when it is just hallucinating.

So here is my experiment with the Chatbot that is getting all the attention these days, the lower level of it. I am sure the higher-level version will be better. It did not fully answer the question, nor did I think it did a thorough job at what it did answer. 6th grade answer in my grade book.

Chat question and answer time:

Write a treatise on the reasons 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses is sustainable for the following reasons, detailed with some statistics on the cost of newly made/created building materials based on energy required to create new glass for windows, new metal for all parts of hardware like door knobs, hinges, and for the cast iron sink, tub, or other metals used such as wire for electric or copper for plumbing. Wood is another item that is salvaged and used versus new wood so figure the cost to cut and process the wood for a new house’s average size now being 2500 square feet. Calculate the cost of the metal roof required to be mined, formed, and shipped to create a house as opposed to the cost reduced by using salvaged roofing which is thicker gauge and will still last as long as the new roof with a self-sealing 30 warranty underlayment. From me to chat

Response:

In recent years, the concept of tiny homes has gained immense popularity due to its sustainability and affordability. One of the most significant aspects of constructing tiny homes is the use of salvaged materials, which not only reduces the cost of construction but also has a positive impact on the environment. The 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses is sustainable for the following reasons:

  1. Reduced Energy Consumption: The construction of a new house requires a massive amount of energy to produce new building materials, such as glass for windows, metal for hardware, copper for plumbing, and wood for framing. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the production of new building materials accounts for 11% of total energy consumption in the United States. By using salvaged materials, the energy required to produce new materials is significantly reduced, thus reducing the carbon footprint.
  2. Cost-Effective: The cost of construction materials has increased significantly in recent years, making it challenging for people to afford new homes. Salvaged materials are available at a fraction of the cost of new materials, making it an affordable option for constructing tiny homes. According to a report by the National Association of Home Builders, the cost of construction materials has increased by 60% over the past decade. In contrast, the cost of salvaged materials has remained relatively stable.
  3. Preservation of History: Salvaged materials have a unique history and character that cannot be replicated by new materials. The use of salvaged materials in construction not only preserves history but also adds to the aesthetic appeal of the tiny home. Salvaged materials such as reclaimed wood and antique hardware add a unique charm and character to the home, making it stand out from conventional homes.
  4. Reduced Waste: The construction industry generates a significant amount of waste, which contributes to environmental pollution. The use of salvaged materials reduces the amount of waste generated during construction, thus reducing the environmental impact. According to the EPA, the construction industry generates 534 million tons of waste annually, accounting for 40% of total waste generated in the United States.
  5. Durability: Salvaged materials are often of higher quality than new materials, making them more durable and long-lasting. For example, salvaged metal roofing is thicker gauge and has a self-sealing 30 warranty underlayment, making it more durable than new roofing materials. The use of salvaged materials ensures that the tiny home is built to last, reducing the need for frequent repairs and replacements.

In conclusion, the 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses is sustainable due to its reduced energy consumption, cost-effectiveness, preservation of history, reduced waste, and durability. The use of salvaged materials in construction not only benefits the environment but also adds to the unique character and charm of the tiny home. As the construction industry continues to grow, it is essential to adopt sustainable practices such as the use of salvaged materials to reduce the environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future.

What do you think, kids? Fun, fancy, creative? No pictures included. I added them.

The vultures of intellectualism await the carnage from the dumbing down of the world through fear, stress, and isolation sprinkled with misinformation and a determination to get the masses under some hypnotic control. AI might just do the trick.

Brad W. Kittel

So I asked a more in-depth question and reprimanded ChatGpt for being too simple. It apologized, to my surprise.
They tried to do better.

That was a 6th-grade level report. Very basic, Can you not do the more extreme extrapolations to show as I asked, how much energy is thus saved, approx. Calories of heat to create glass per sf for example, as a reference to the energy saved by not using new glass. Also, the savings on trees, old growth lumber that will outlast new lumber, and the longevity of the salvage-built houses due to their higher quality and not using cheap materials like sheetrock, vinyl, plastics, or composites but all salvaged materials. How much energy is saved by not having to make all those items to build with? How much toxic pollution is saved by not making the materials to build a house with? How much fuel is saved by not importing a single item from another country? If a salvage-built home with old-growth lumber can last for another hundred years as it did in use for the last structure, it will have 4-5 lifetime use compared to new tiny house-on-wheels mobile homes built in factories with materials that have a 7-15 year life.
Doesn’t that mean the salvage-built house will be four times more energy-saving by not having to reproduce it every 15 years like the new houses?
I apologize for the previous report’s simplistic nature. Here is a more detailed explanation of the energy and environmental savings associated with 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses:

Energy Savings: The production of new building materials requires a significant amount of energy. For example, the production of glass for windows requires approximately 6,000-8,000 calories of heat per square foot. In contrast, salvaged windows require no additional energy to produce, resulting in significant energy savings. If we assume an average tiny house size of 250 square feet, the use of salvaged windows alone could save approximately 1,500,000-2,000,000 calories of heat.
Similarly, the production of new lumber requires energy for harvesting, processing, and transportation. According to the US Forest Service, one acre of forest can produce approximately 2,000 board feet of lumber. If we assume an average tiny house requires approximately 500 board feet of lumber, then salvaging lumber from one-quarter acre of forest can supply enough lumber for one tiny house. This means that the energy required to harvest, process, and transport new lumber is saved, resulting in significant energy savings.

Environmental Savings: The production of new building materials also has a significant environmental impact. For example, the production of cement, which is used in concrete, is responsible for approximately 8% of global carbon dioxide emissions. The production of new lumber also contributes to deforestation, which has a negative impact on the environment.
Salvaged materials, on the other hand, have a significantly lower environmental impact. The use of salvaged materials reduces the amount of waste generated during construction and reduces the need for new materials, resulting in significant environmental savings. Additionally, the use of salvaged materials preserves historical resources and reduces the need for new resource extraction, further reducing the environmental impact.

Longevity: Salvaged materials are often of higher quality than new materials, resulting in more durable and long-lasting structures. For example, old-growth lumber is denser and more resistant to rot and insects than new lumber. Salvaged materials such as antique hardware and fixtures are also often of higher quality and can last longer than new materials.
The longevity of salvage-built homes means that they require fewer repairs and replacements over time, resulting in significant energy and environmental savings. If a salvage-built home can last for 100 years or more, as opposed to a new tiny home on wheels with a lifespan of 7-15 years, the energy and environmental savings associated with the salvage-built home are significant.

In conclusion, the 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses is a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional construction methods. The use of salvaged materials results in significant energy and environmental savings, and the longevity of salvage-built homes means that they require fewer repairs and replacements over time.

The cost of producing corrugated roofing of the same thickness as the older stuff, double present standards, and the savings from not making hinges for doors, 8 lb cast iron weights 2 per window, and savings on the cost of the materials, which if salvaged, are free except for human energy, which if donated by the beneficiary of the wood and windows, doors, floors, and other parts, then gets the materials virtually for free. Given that factor, what would you estimate the savings in cost, on a ratio basis versus the cost using new materials, imports, and energy costs to do that.
The cost savings associated with 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses can be significant, especially when compared to the cost of new construction using imported materials and energy-intensive production methods.

The cost of producing corrugated roofing of the same thickness as the older stuff, double present standards, can be expensive due to the energy and resources required to produce the new material. In contrast, salvaged corrugated roofing can be obtained for free or at a significantly reduced cost, resulting in significant cost savings.

Similarly, salvaged materials such as hinges, cast iron weights, and other hardware can be obtained for free or at a significantly reduced cost, resulting in additional cost savings. When salvaged materials are donated by the beneficiary of the wood and windows, doors, floors, and other parts, the cost savings can be even greater.

Overall, the cost savings associated with 95% Pure Salvage building for tiny houses can vary depending on the specific materials used, the availability of salvaged materials, and the amount of human energy required to obtain and process salvaged materials. However, it is clear that the use of salvaged materials can result in significant cost savings compared to new construction using imported materials and energy-intensive production methods.